ROAD MAP FOR South
Sudan IGAD LED PEACE TALKS.
Position
of the Catholic Church:.
Presented
by:
His
Lordship Bishop Santo Pio.
Auxiliary
Bishop of Archdioceses of Juba
2nd.
April 2014
Nairobi
Introduction:
Catholic Church, present this analyses with:
Sadness, distress, and pain
at heart when Christians in Juba see the violence which started as a political
disagreement and power struggle between President Salva Kiir and Vice President
Dr. Riak Machar has quickly spilled over into ethnic killings, between brothers and sisters of Dinka and Nuer
of the same SPLM Party and Army,,
The destructions carried out
by them in Juba, Bor, Malakal and Bentiu on human person, infrastructure, and
Government installations, made the Church to think our history is an open wound
that desperately needs healing.
Many experts, Diplomats,
believe the crisis in SPLM Party will be resolved by South Sudanese through
inclusive participation of all South Sudanese (Political Parties, Civil Society
and faith communities)
IGAD Assembly of Heads of
State and Government Communiqué of the 25th Extra- Ordinary session
dated 13th March 2014 item 10. (Quote)
·
Reaffirms the need for an inclusive political
dialogue and further call on the parties to include in the negotiations all
South Sudanese Stakeholders particularly SPLM Leaders (Former Detainees) other
political parties and representatives of CSOs as deemed necessary by the
mediation process. .
Government delegation and Sudan People’s
Liberation Movement/ Army in Opposition began talks in Addis- Ababa from 14th
January 2014 and signed two Agreements:
1. Agreement on cessation of
hostilities,
2. Agreement on the Status of the Detainees.
6TH February
2014:
Church delegation under the
umbrella of South Sudan Council of Churches was sent to Addis- Ababa accompanied by General Secretary of All Africa
Conference of Churches (AACC), Dr. Andrea Karamaga, Secretary of Africa Desk
World Council of Churches (WCC) Dr. Nigussu Legessu to Convey Prophetic Message
of the Church to African Union, IGAD Envoys,, Government of South Sudan, and
the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army in Opposition on the senseless
fighting between the SPLM members, and the position of the Church that fighting
must stop and serious peace talks must begin..
This Situation analysis is
an Independent analysis which is not influenced by any Political System or
group; the analysis will cover:
1. Role of the Church
2. Background
to the current crisis. (1991- 2005)
3. Way
Forward.
Role of the Church
The Church by reason of her
role and competence is not identified with any political Community nor bound by
ties to any political system. It is the sign and the safeguard of the
transcendental dimension of human person.
Why Church should get involved in the Peace Talks:
1. Ethical leadership:
·
The process of negotiations can sometimes
degenerate into a political or ideological rivalry, where each party tries to
gain the upper hand. If this happens, the root causes of the conflict can
become lost. Churches are in good position to provide an independent position which
will reflect the common good of all the views of the citizens of South Sudan
and put pressure on the parties to accept the demands of the People to end the
fighting immediately.
2. Non – partisan approach.
·
Churches and faith communities are usually
not connected to any one or political parties. The Church is free, therefore can
analyze and evaluate the positions of the conflicting parties without fear and
favor, and to support or reject these proposals on the basis of fundamental values
rather than party loyalties.
3. Voice of the voiceless.
·
Not all South Sudanese will travel to Addis-
Ababa to present their views to the IGAD Mediators Church is always the voice
of the voiceless and can ensure that the voice of the people and their concerns
are taken into the discussions. It is important for the IGAD Mediators, African
Union to give absolutely every one opportunity to participate.
Have given this highlights,
there will be no meaningful solution to the conflict if the root causes is not
understood, the paper shall give highlights of the Background to the crisis.
. Background
to the crisis.
Militia Groups:
.Government of Sudan recruited
Militia groups in the Southern Sudan to fight a proxy war against the
Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A). These Militia groups were
organized in:
Greater
Upper Nile:
·
Under
General Paolino Matip, General Gordon Koung, and General Gabriel Tanginya; with
bases in Bentiu and Khartoum Johnson
Olony with the base in the West Nile Shilluk areas Aywok Ogad: with the base in Northern Upper
Nile – Manyo County
Greater
Baher el Ghazal:
·
Fertit Militia under General Tom El Nur
·
Dinka
Militia under General Abdel Bagi Ayii in Northern Baher El Ghazal.
Greater
Equatoria:
·
(Commandos
Under General Clement Wani, with strong base in Central Equatoria
1991:
Split
in Sudan Peoples Liberation Movement/Army.
Dr. Riak Machar on 28th August 1991
vide message no 299/8/99 declared that he had overthrown Dr. John Garang from
the leadership of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army.
Followers of Dr. Riak Machar and Dr. John
Garang de - Mabior fought bitter war against each other which forced Dr. Riak
Machar and his Group to sign Khartoum Peace Agreement in 1997.
According to the Khartoum Peace Agreement 1997
Dr. Riak Machar became the President of the Coordination Council of the ten
(10) Southern States
2000
Southern Sudanese Political Leaders through Sudan Council
of Churches (SCC) put pressure on Dr. Riak Machar to rejoin the Movement and
Reconcile with Dr. John Garang de- Mabior in the Interest of Southern Sudan,
and to fight for the Right for self- determination. Dr. Riak Machar
responded and rejoined SPLM / A. however No proper reconciliation process
between Dr. John, and Dr. Riak and community of Bor was established and Dr.
Riak Machar and his followers were not held accountable for all the killings that took place as a
result of the 1991 division in Bor and Jonglie State
Comprehensive
Peace Agreement (CPA) 2005
Government of Sudan (GOS)
and Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army in 2005 signed Comprehensive Peace
Agreement 2005 and according to the security arrangement Protocol no any
militia group was allowed to operate in the Sudan. Militia groups were to
choose to join Sudan Armed Forces or Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA)
Juba
Declaration 2006:
Sudan
People’s Liberation Movement/Army had conference in Juba and made Juba
Declaration which according to the declaration Militia Groups were to be
integrated into the Sudan People’s Liberation Army.
Blanket
Amnesty:
President of Republic from 2006 issued number of blanket Amnesty to all the Militia Groups. All those who responded, were integrated into
Sudan People’s Liberation Army with their ranks and allowed to be in charge of
their forces which remained not fully
integrated into Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) and majority of them were
from Nuer ethnic community.
.Composition of SPLM
Party.
1. Most of the Generals of Sudan People’s
Liberation Army are members of the Party and chairpersons in the States and
members of Political Bureau and National Liberation Council have strong grip on
the Army and have private Armies loyal to them and not to the Nation.
2. SPLM
– Mainstream:
·
This is mostly composed of those
who did not join Dr. Riak in 1991. They see
Themselves
as historical leaders and the custodians of the Party and the victims since the
death of Dr. John Garang in 2005 and been marginalized by the Leadership of
President Salva Kiir Mayardiid.
3 November
2004 Group:
This group composed mainly of those who supported President
Salva Kiir against Dr. John Garang during the dispute in 2004, majority are
from his loyal HQS Staff, and some of
his close relatives and clansmen from Bahr el Ghazal.
4th Group
·
ex. 1991 Nasir Group, Anya- Anya 2 remnants,
·
National Congress Party Defectors
·
Opportunists who defect and rejoin so that
they can be reincorporated with better ranks and positions.
Current Crisis:
Dinka, supporters of President
Salva Kiirr, Nuer supporters of Dr. Riak Machar killing themselves.
June 2013:
Dr. Riak Machar Vice President of the Republic
of South Sudan and member of the Presidency, Vice Chairperson of the Sudan
People’s Liberation Movement Party (SPLM) openly began to criticize President
Salva Kiir of the failure to Administer and manage the country properly,
combats corruption, and stop culture of impunity in the Country.
President Salva Kiir reacted by withdrawing all the
Presidential powers delegated by him to Dr. Riak and
left him as Vice President of the Republic of South Sudan and Deputy
Chairperson of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement Party.
Nuer Community and political leaders got
disappointed and wanted to fight back but Dr. Riak Machar called for calm among
his community.
July
23rd 2013:
President dismissed the entire
cabinet and the Vice President through Republican Decrees:
·
No. 49/2013 which Relieved Dr. Riak
Machar as the Vice President of the Republic of South Sudan.
·
No 50/2013 relieved all the National Ministers
of the Government of the Republic of South Sudan.
·
Decree No 51/2013 relieved all the National
Deputy Ministers.
·
The Chairperson’s Order N0 01/2013
suspended SPLM Secretary General and formed committee to investigate the SPLM
Secretary General.
All the dismissed Ministers most of them are
SPLM/Army generals were all senior Sudan People’s Liberation Movement Party
members.
The removal of Dr. Riak Machar from the post
of Vice President did not go well with Nuer ethnic group. The situation became tense and all indicators
were that there was going to be a fight between supporters of the President and
that of the Vice President.
Killing of Traffic Police Officer:
·
Traffic Police Officer from Nuer
ethnic community was killed in the Residence of the Minister Salva Mathok. Nuer
community expected it was the work of the Dinka security guards in the
residence of the Minister.
Killing of Custom Officer:
·
A young custom officer was killed
and burnt in his car by unknown person whom Dinka believe it was the work of
Nuer community and no one was found to have done the killing.
August
2013:
·
The Dismissed Ministers called on
the Chairperson of the Party to call for the meeting of the Political Bureau to
draw agenda for the National Liberation Council which the President/
Chairperson of the Party did not accept and ordered the dissolution of the two
structures of the Party (Political Bureau and National Liberation Council) that
they have exceeded their mandate and terms of the Office. .
·
The
dissolution of the two structures and the refusal of the Chairperson to
call meeting of the Political Bureau made Dr. Riak Machar, Madam Rebecca
Nyadeng and Pagan Amum to announce their
intentions to challenge President Salva Kiir by contesting for the position of
the Chairman of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement Party during National
Convention and in 2015 to be the flag bearer of the SPLM Candidate for the post
of the President of the Republic of South Sudan which was not well received by
the Chairperson of the Party and his followers..
6th
December 2013:
·
Dr. Riak Machar and the Ex-
Ministers gave a press conference in SPLM House in Juba called on the
Chairperson of the Party to organize the National Liberation Council Conference
and outlined the following problems in the SPLM Party.:
a) Lack of democracy in the SPLM Party,
b) No
freedom of speech and press,
c) Building up of Parallel Army of 15,000
Republican Guards by the President from one tribe.
14th December 2013:
·
Dr. Riak and ex- Ministers planned
a public rally in Juba to address the public and SPLM leadership also planned the National
Liberation Council Conference on 14th December 2013 conflicting with
the plans of the group with Dr. Riak Machar. The Church leaders called on the
President not to hold National Liberation Conference but the prophetic voice of
the Church was ignored.
·
National Liberation Council
Conference opened on 14th December 2013 as planned which forced the
group with Dr. Riak Machar to call off the Public Rally to attend the National
Liberation Council Conference.
·
His Grace Archbishop Paulino Lukudu Loro in
opening session appealed to the Leadership of the SPLM for Reconciliation but
the call was not taken into context.
·
Differences between the followers
of the President and the Group with Dr. Riak Machar became more apparent and on
Sunday the Group with Dr. Riak Machar boycotted the last sessions of the
conference.
·
According to the Sources close to the SPLM
Party President did not feel comfortable with the boycott of the Conference by
the group and ordered that Presidential Guards from the Nuer Community be
disarmed. The Nuer Community disobeyed the order to disarm.
15th
December 2013:
·
Residences of Juba were shocked to
see brothers and sisters of the same Party Sudan People’s Liberation Movement
Were killing each other in targeted manner which quickly slide into ethnic
killings between Nuer and Dinka in
Juba, Bor, Malakal and Bentiu .
Intervention.
IGAD Heads of States:
Were quick to
respond and called summit of the IGAD Heads of States in Nairobi and called on both parties to
call off the fighting and begin dialogue within four days.
African
Union:
African Union called
summit of all Heads of States to discuss the situation in Southern Sudan and
resolved the matter must be quickly brought to an end. Republic of Uganda
dispatched UPDF to support the Government of South Sudan against the coup.
African
Union Security Council:
Called meeting of the
Security Council to discuss the matter and approved to send 5,000 African Peace
Keeping Force to South Sudan which up to the writing of this paper have not
arrived South Sudan.
United
Nation:
Secretary General, of
United Nations called meeting of Security Council to discuss the situation in
South Sudan and immediately approved sending of additional 6,000 Peace Keeping
Forces to South Sudan making the total of 12,000 Peace Keeping Forces in South
Sudan under UNMISS.
14th
January 2014:
The two parties (Sudan People’s
Liberation Movement members in Government and SPLM/A in Opposition) Began peace talks on 14th January 2014 in Addis-
Ababa and on 23rd January 2014 signed two Agreements.
1. Agreement on cessation of
hostilities,
2. Agreement on the Status of the Detainees.
However
neither diplomatic pressure nor the IGAD and Africa Union efforts had any
impact in restraining warring parties from fighting.
Way Forward:
The process should have
three tracks:
Track 1:
·
should aim at
stopping the fighting by the two Parties and allow the Negotiations to precede otherwise no meaningful peace
talks will take place while fighting is going on
·
Provide Humanitarian
Aid to all the affected Areas.
Track ii:
Catholic Church supports
items, 10 and 11 in Communiqué of the 25th Extra- Ordinary session
Of IGAD Assembly of Heads of State and Government dated 13th March 2014.
(Quote)
·
“Reaffirms the need for an inclusive
political dialogue and further call on the parties to include in the
negotiations all South Sudanese Stakeholders particularly SPLM Leaders (Former
Detainees) other political parties and representatives of CSOs as deemed
necessary by the mediation process”. .
Draft
Agenda Two of Phase 11 of IGAD- led South Sudan Mediation Process
·
Declaration of Principles (D.O.P)
Governance and Democracy
·
Sudan have tried
highly centralized system that have failed. Tried Decentralized that have
brought more trouble. People of Southern Sudan 1955 called for (Federal System of Government but Government
of Sudan refused to implement, time has come to consider introducing Federal
System in Republic of South Sudan to address the issue of Tribal/Ethnic imbalances).
Track iii:
·
Political Dialogue towards National Reconciliation and
Healing
“Let
us Re-found our nation on a new covenant”
·
“At
this time more than ever the bold prophetic Voice of the Church needs to be
heard We have been shocked by the events that have rocked our new nation
since 15th December 2013,
·
We
have witnessed things that should never have taken place on the soil of this
nation, as brother fought against brother, leading to so much unnecessary death
and displacement of individuals and communities with many fleeing as refugees
to neighboring countries, and the most appalling destructions.
·
We cannot remain silent in the face of what we
have witnessed and heard. We speak on behalf of those who have spoken to us
Catholic
Bishops of Sudan/ South Sudan statement on 31st January 2014: